Skip to content

Conversation

@BioPhoton
Copy link
Collaborator

@BioPhoton BioPhoton commented Dec 2, 2025

Followup of #1163

This PR includes:

  • create nx plugin under zod2md-jsdocs
  • logic to add target config if file matches zod2md.config.ts
  • plugin docs
  • remove old config
  • remove file reference from production inputs as changes in the config may impact build output

A potential followup PR could implement a nx plugin for our build target and add dependsOn settings automatically. This is also noted in a clean up issue.

Note

This is tooling code and it is not planned to get released

Related:
#1168

@github-actions github-actions bot added 📖 Project documentation improvements or additions to the project documentation 🛠️ tooling labels Dec 2, 2025
@nx-cloud
Copy link

nx-cloud bot commented Dec 2, 2025

View your CI Pipeline Execution ↗ for commit 8d90f87

Command Status Duration Result
nx run ci:code-pushup -- merge-diffs --files=/h... ✅ Succeeded 5s View ↗
nx run-many --targets=code-pushup --parallel=fa... ✅ Succeeded 1m 29s View ↗
nx run-many --targets=code-pushup --parallel=fa... ✅ Succeeded 12m 54s View ↗
nx run-many -t unit-test,int-test ✅ Succeeded 3s View ↗

☁️ Nx Cloud last updated this comment at 2025-12-05 16:58:27 UTC

@pkg-pr-new
Copy link

pkg-pr-new bot commented Dec 2, 2025

Open in StackBlitz

@code-pushup/ci

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/code-pushup/cli/@code-pushup/ci@1162

@code-pushup/cli

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/code-pushup/cli/@code-pushup/cli@1162

@code-pushup/core

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/code-pushup/cli/@code-pushup/core@1162

@code-pushup/create-cli

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/code-pushup/cli/@code-pushup/create-cli@1162

@code-pushup/models

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/code-pushup/cli/@code-pushup/models@1162

@code-pushup/nx-plugin

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/code-pushup/cli/@code-pushup/nx-plugin@1162

@code-pushup/axe-plugin

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/code-pushup/cli/@code-pushup/axe-plugin@1162

@code-pushup/coverage-plugin

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/code-pushup/cli/@code-pushup/coverage-plugin@1162

@code-pushup/eslint-plugin

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/code-pushup/cli/@code-pushup/eslint-plugin@1162

@code-pushup/js-packages-plugin

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/code-pushup/cli/@code-pushup/js-packages-plugin@1162

@code-pushup/jsdocs-plugin

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/code-pushup/cli/@code-pushup/jsdocs-plugin@1162

@code-pushup/lighthouse-plugin

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/code-pushup/cli/@code-pushup/lighthouse-plugin@1162

@code-pushup/typescript-plugin

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/code-pushup/cli/@code-pushup/typescript-plugin@1162

@code-pushup/utils

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/code-pushup/cli/@code-pushup/utils@1162

commit: 8d90f87

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Dec 2, 2025

Code PushUp

🤨 Code PushUp report has both improvements and regressions – compared current commit c35dd16 with previous commit f74d2dd.

🕵️ See full comparison in Code PushUp portal 🔍

🏷️ Categories

🏷️ Category ⭐ Previous score ⭐ Current score 🔄 Score change
Code coverage 🟡 89 🟡 89 ↓ −0.1
Bug prevention 🟡 67 🟡 67
Code style 🟢 100 🟢 100
Security 🔴 43 🔴 43
Updates 🟡 71 🟡 71
Type Safety 🟡 56 🟡 56
Miscellaneous 🟡 67 🟡 67
Documentation 🔴 35 🔴 35
Performance 🔴 44 🔴 44
Accessibility 🟢 92 🟢 92
Best Practices 🟢 100 🟢 100
SEO 🟢 92 🟢 92
👎 1 group regressed, 👍 3 audits improved, 👎 4 audits regressed, 13 audits changed without impacting score

🗃️ Groups

🔌 Plugin 🗃️ Group ⭐ Previous score ⭐ Current score 🔄 Score change
Code coverage Code coverage metrics 🟡 89 🟡 89 ↓ −0.1

22 other groups are unchanged.

🛡️ Audits

🔌 Plugin 🛡️ Audit 📏 Previous value 📏 Current value 🔄 Value change
Lighthouse Speed Index 🟥 6.7 s 🟥 6.1 s ↓ −9 %
Lighthouse First Contentful Paint 🟥 3.2 s 🟥 3.1 s ↓ −4 %
Lighthouse Total Blocking Time 🟥 800 ms 🟥 880 ms ↑ +10.7 %
Lighthouse Time to Interactive 🟥 13.0 s 🟥 12.6 s ↓ −3.2 %
Code coverage Line coverage 🟨 84.7 % 🟨 84.3 % ↓ −0.4 %
Code coverage Function coverage 🟩 90.3 % 🟩 90.2 % ↓ −0.1 %
Code coverage Branch coverage 🟨 87.3 % 🟨 87.2 % ↓ −0.1 %
Lighthouse Avoids enormous network payloads 🟩 Total size was 2,032 KiB 🟩 Total size was 2,068 KiB ↑ +1.8 %
Lighthouse Server Backend Latencies 🟩 1,760 ms 🟩 1,190 ms ↓ −32.6 %
Lighthouse Largest Contentful Paint 🟥 11.6 s 🟥 11.1 s ↓ −4.3 %
Lighthouse Metrics 🟩 100% 🟩 100% ↓ −3.2 %
Lighthouse Minimizes main-thread work 🟥 7.5 s 🟥 7.3 s ↓ −2.7 %
Lighthouse Reduce unused CSS 🟥 Potential savings of 105 KiB 🟥 Potential savings of 105 KiB ↓ −29.9 %
Lighthouse Initial server response time was short 🟥 Root document took 790 ms 🟥 Root document took 630 ms ↓ −19.7 %
Lighthouse Uses efficient cache policy on static assets 🟨 32 resources found 🟨 32 resources found ↑ +0.1 %
Lighthouse JavaScript execution time 🟥 2.9 s 🟥 3.1 s ↑ +4.5 %
Lighthouse Reduce unused JavaScript 🟥 Potential savings of 186 KiB 🟥 Potential savings of 194 KiB ↑ +14.5 %
Lighthouse Remove duplicate modules in JavaScript bundles 🟥 Potential savings of 104 KiB 🟥 Potential savings of 104 KiB ↓ −6 %
Lighthouse Network Round Trip Times 🟩 50 ms 🟩 30 ms ↓ −33.8 %
Lighthouse Max Potential First Input Delay 🟥 840 ms 🟥 840 ms ↓ −0.6 %

658 other audits are unchanged.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Dec 2, 2025

Code PushUp

😐 Code PushUp report is unchanged – compared current commit c35dd16 with previous commit f74d2dd.


All of 14 projects are unchanged.

@BioPhoton BioPhoton marked this pull request as ready for review December 2, 2025 23:41
@BioPhoton BioPhoton requested a review from matejchalk December 2, 2025 23:41
BioPhoton and others added 7 commits December 3, 2025 16:20
Co-authored-by: Matěj Chalk <34691111+matejchalk@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Matěj Chalk <34691111+matejchalk@users.noreply.github.com>
BioPhoton added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 5, 2025
This PR moves the transformer logic into tools and makes it configurable

Followup PR: #1162

---------

Co-authored-by: John Doe <john.doe@example.com>
Co-authored-by: Matěj Chalk <34691111+matejchalk@users.noreply.github.com>
@github-actions github-actions bot added the 🔬 testing writing tests label Dec 5, 2025
@BioPhoton BioPhoton requested a review from matejchalk December 5, 2025 16:45
@BioPhoton BioPhoton mentioned this pull request Dec 5, 2025
9 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

🧹 maintenance 📖 Project documentation improvements or additions to the project documentation 🔬 testing writing tests 🛠️ tooling

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants